Dark Half redux

BLAZE turned out to be pretty good - not great, but it definitely ranks toward the upper-middle in Bachman's ouvre. Somewhere below THE LONG WALK and THE RUNNING MAN, but just above RAGE and ROADWORK. (And I'll just have to assume it was better than THE REGULATORS.) I wasn't disappointed, but I wasn't cheering by the end, either.

What I've noticed about Bachman is that he's writing a lot more like King than he used to. Witness his turn to the supernatural. RAGE and ROADWORK, were set in solid reality, a world of school shootings and government bypasses. In THE LONG WALK and THE RUNNING MAN, Bachman dabbled a bit in Sci-Fi (something King wasn't exactly averse to, either), but once it became known that King and Bachman were one and the same - coincidentally, with the publication of Bachman's first horror novel, THINNER - he seemed to get typed, as did his real-life counterpart, as a horror writer. According to the synopsis on Amazon.com, THE REGULATORS is about "an evil creature called Tak [who] uses the imagination of an autistic boy to shift a residential street in small-town Ohio into a world so bizarre and brutal that only a child could think it up." That has, if you'll pardon the pun, King written all over it. And not good King, either, but latter-day DARK TOWER spin-off King.

Although I'd only read the Bachman books after I found out he was King, they always seemed different - not "King Lite" different, but different in a very real way, as if King and Bachman really were different people, different personalities - or at least different sides of the same personality. But they were written as Bachman, published as Bachman, and then revealed to be King. Now that the secret's out and everybody knows who's who, King's continued use of the Bachman name seems almost disrespectful. Even though BLAZE was written during the Bachman years, it was Stephen King who went back and did the touching up. And it was published with the knowledge that everyone already knows Bachman is fictional - that has to have an effect on the way it's written (or in this case, edited).

I've gotta say, I hope BLAZE isn't the last of the Bachman books, no matter what genre he decides to focus on. I prefer BLAZE to any of the newer King, anyway. And now we have DUMA KEY to look forward to...

Bachman vs. King

First he was retiring from writing. Then, not so much from writing, just retiring from publishing. Now, three books later, Stephen King is not only still writing and publishing, but he's publishing books he wrote back in the early 70s.

Not that I'm complaining. Look, I like a good King book as much as the next fella. A good King book. Like The Shining, Salem's Lot or The Dead Zone. Even once he became a Brand Name in the mid- to late-80s, the stuff he was putting out (It, Misery, The Tommyknockers) wasn't markedly different from his early work, but it was different enough to let you know he'd turned a corner, creatively. Lately, though, it seems he's not only turned another corner, but gone completely 'round the bend.

Ever since Insomnia. That's where I first started noticing it, and to date it's the only King book I've never been able to finish. It was the introduction of the Crimson King, and the first book in the Dark Tower cycle that wasn't lumped in retroactively. ("The Talisman? Sure, that's a Dark Tower story. Crouch End? Er, um... yep, that one too!") Instead, King confronted us with the "Crimson King" in various novels, poor second-cousins to the Dark Tower series, for the next decade, until finally wrapping "everything" up in the lame-ass final DT book.

This new one, Blaze, was written in late 1972 and early 1973, which gives me some hope. As King explains in the introduction, it was the last book written in the 66-73 period, when he was publishing under the name Richard Bachman, and so Blaze, too, carries this name.

Personally, I don't care if he wanted to publish under the name John Swithen again - early King is always going to be better than latter day King, no matter whose name is on the cover.

Alice and Left-Overs

Lacking anything new to post, here are two one-act plays I wrote for the LCTI play writing contest. The rules state that all plays submitted "should center on a common theme, idea or concept." The theme for the first one was "reflections". The second one was "food".

Alice Doesn't Live Here Anymore (or "The Heisenberg Principle and How it Applies to You") was written at 3:30am in a haze of allergy-induced fever and allergy medicine-induced perplexity. I didn't realize until the second draft that what I'd written was an indictment of organized religion.

I'd been reading a lot of Mamet around this time, as should be obvious from the dialog - which is probably a bit try-hard, I don't mind admitting. My friend Robin Reck was going to make a short film based on this, but I don't know what ever happened to that...

Left-Overs, was written after my first year of marriage. A bit absurdist, this one. Clearly influenced by David Ives. It's kind of a meditation on realizing you need to let go of whatever personal bullshit you brought into the relationship, and just move on from there. File that under "Water is Wet, Sky is Blue and Other Not-So-Shocking Revelations".

Both plays were performed on the LCT stage. I got to direct myself, my uncle Fred and my brother Mike in Alice, but I was living in Australia when Left-Overs was staged, so my friend Beth Lapp took the reigns on that one, directing my friends Jenny Loy and Jonathan Bjorkstedt.

I love writing shorts like these. You couldn't base a full-length play on either of these ideas, but they're too good (in my own ever-so-humble opinion) to just let go altogether.